Re: [PATCH 1/3] patch-id: make it stable against hunk reordering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I started to remove that code, but then I recalled why I did it like
> this.  There is a good reason.  Yes, you can't simply reorder hunks just
> like this.  But you can get the same effect by prefixing the header:

Yes, that is one of the things I personally have on the chopping
block.  Having to deal with more than occurrences of the same
pathname in the input made things in builtin/apply.c unnecessarily
complex and I do not see a real gain for being able to concatenate
two patches and feed it into a single "git apply" invocation.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]