Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] ls-files: buffer full item in strbuf before printing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  static void show_dir_entry(const char *tag, struct dir_entry *ent)
>>  {
>> +       static struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
>>         int len = max_prefix_len;
>>
>>         if (len >= ent->len)
>> @@ -67,8 +79,10 @@ static void show_dir_entry(const char *tag, struct dir_entry *ent)
>>         if (!dir_path_match(ent, &pathspec, len, ps_matched))
>>                 return;
>>
>> -       fputs(tag, stdout);
>> -       write_name(ent->name);
>> +       strbuf_reset(&sb);
>> +       strbuf_addstr(&sb, tag);
>> +       write_name(&sb, ent->name);
>> +       strbuf_fputs(&sb, stdout);
>
> strbuf_release(&sb);

Not strictly necessary because sb is static and will be reset at the
next call. I just want to lower the number of allocation (write_name
allocates some more). It may be a premature optimization though.

The same for changes in show_ce_entry().
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]