On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:36:18PM +0000, Charles Bailey wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:40:43PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:33:59PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > > > That being said, is the AIX value actually right? I did not look closely > > > at first, but just assumed that it was vaguely right. But: > > > > > > 999999999999999999 / (86400 * 365) > > > > > > is something like 31 billion years in the future, not 160 million. > > > A real date calculation will have a few tweaks (leap years, etc), but > > > that is orders of magnitude off. > > > > Assuming my math is right, then here is the most sensible patch, IMHO. > > > > Perhaps hold onto this one for a little while longer. Splitting things > out from the test is giving me some inconsistent results, there may be > something else going wrong in our environment here. By the way, can you confirm that this is a 64-bit system? On a 32-bit system, we should be triggering different code paths (we fail at the strtoul level). Those should be checked by the previous tests, but I'd like to make sure. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html