Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c >>> index a452407..e55e5b9 100644 >>> --- a/wt-status.c >>> +++ b/wt-status.c >>> @@ -1509,19 +1509,23 @@ static void wt_shortstatus_print_tracking(struct wt_status *s) >>> return; >>> } >>> >>> + const char *gone = s->no_gettext ? "gone" : _("gone"); >>> + const char *behind = s->no_gettext ? "behind " : _("behind "); >>> + const char *ahead = s->no_gettext ? "ahead " : _("ahead "); >> >> Having to repeat the same string constant twice (and a half for the >> variable name) each is an eyesore. I wonder if we can do better, >> perhaps with: >> >> #define LABEL(string) (s->no_gettext ? (string) : _(string)) >> >> and then >> >> color_fprintf(s->fp, header_color, LABEL(N_("gone"))); >> >> or something along those lines? > > I first thought about trying something clever with the preprocessor, but > since it's only for 3 strings, I went the KISS way. I tend to prefer my > version for simplicity, but no strong opinion here. Then I'll squash 61bf9709 (SQUASH??? fix decl-after-stmt and simplify, 2014-03-20) in before merging the patch to 'next'. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html