On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 20.03.2014 17:08, schrieb Stefan Zager: > >> Going forward, there is still a lot of performance that gets left on >> the table when you rule out threaded file access. There are not so >> many calls to read, mmap, and pread in the code; it should be possible >> to rationalize them and make them thread-safe -- at least, thread-safe >> for posix-compliant systems and msysgit, which covers the great >> majority of git users, I would hope. >> > > IMO a "mostly" XSI compliant pread (or even the git_pread() emulation) is still better than forbidding the use of read() entirely. Switching from read to pread everywhere requires that all callers have to keep track of the file position, which means a _lot_ of code changes (read/xread/strbuf_read is used in ~70 places throughout git). And how do you plan to deal with platforms that don't have a thread-safe pread (HP, Cygwin)? > > Considering all that, Duy's solution of opening separate file descriptors per thread seems to be the best pattern for future multi-threaded work. Does that mean you would endorse the (N threads) * (M pack files) approach to threading checkout and status? That seems kind of crazy-town to me. Not to mention that pack windows are not shared, so this approach to multi-threading can have the side-effect of blowing out memory consumption. We have already had to dial back settings for pack.threads and core.deltaBaseCacheLimit, because threaded index-pack was causing OOM errors on 32-bit platforms. Cygwin (and MSVC) should be able to share a "mostly" compliant pread implementation. I don't have any insight into NonstopKernel; does is really not have a thread-safe pread implementation? If so, then I suppose we have to #ifdef NO_PREAD, just as we do now. I realize that these are deep changes. However, the performance of msysgit on the chromium repositories is pretty awful, enough so to motivate this work. Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html