Re: [PATCH 0/3] Make git more user-friendly during a merge conflict

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Has this series been tested with existing test suite?  I tentatively
> queued it to 'pu' but then had to revert because many tests started
> failing, causing me to redo the today's integration cycle for 'pu'
> once again.

I tested it during RFC, but missed it when I sent it as patch. The
problem is here:

@@ -1559,6 +1563,8 @@ int cmd_merge(int argc, const char **argv, const
char *prefix)
        if (merge_was_ok)
                fprintf(stderr, _("Automatic merge went well; "
                        "stopped before committing as requested\n"));
+       if (advice_merge_hints)
+               printf(_("  (use \"git merge --abort\" to abort the merge)\n"));
        else
                ret = suggest_conflicts(option_
renormalize);

I'll fix the problem. Sorry about that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]