Re: [PATCH] general style: replaces memcmp() with proper starts_with()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:33:50PM -0400, Quint Guvernator wrote:

> It is _not_ my goal to make the code harder to maintain down the road.
> So, at this point, which hunks (if any) are worth patching?

This discussion ended up encompassing a lot of other related cleanups. I
hope we didn't scare you away. :)

My understanding is that you were approaching this as a micro-project
for GSoC. I'd love it if you want to pick up and run with some of the
ideas discussed here. But as far as a microproject goes, I think it
would make sense to identify one or two no-brainer improvement spots by
hand, and submit a patch with just those (and I think Junio gave some
good guidelines in his reply).

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]