Re: [PATCH 1/2] run_diff_{files,index}(): update calling convention.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/10/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Marco Costalba" <mcostalba@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Running 'git runstatus' alone shows _all_ the repo files, although are
> not modified and not touched.

That does not sound right with or without my patch.  Are you
talking about the 'git runstatus' with my patch is showing
paths that are cache clean?  If that is the case that means my
patch is introudcing regression.


'git runstatus'  shows all the files also _before_ your patch has been
applied (I have tested again now resetting HEAD so to remove your two
patches).

What is strange is that running 'git runstatus' on Linux on a repo
under a ntfs directory shows all the files, while running 'git status'
under windows under the same repo (so now we have write access) shows
things correctly.

It seems that perhaps lstat(2) info of a mounted ntfs directory is not
correct?????? very very  strange!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]