Re: [PATCH v4] install_branch_config: simplify verbose messages logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> +               if (origin && remote_is_branch)
>> +                       printf_ln(_(message[!remote_is_branch][!origin][!rebasing]),
>> +                               local, name, origin);
>>                 else
>> -                       die("BUG: impossible combination of %d and %p",
>> -                           remote_is_branch, origin);
>> +                       printf_ln(_(message[!remote_is_branch][!origin][!rebasing]),
>> +                               local, name);
>
> Shouldn't this logic also be encoded in the table? After all, the
> point of making the code table-driven is so that such hard-coded logic
> can be avoided. It shouldn't be difficult to do.

Hmph.  Is it even necessary in the first place?  Does it hurt if you
give more parameters than the number of placeholders in the format
string?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]