Re: An idea for "git bisect" and a GSoC enquiry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jacopo Notarstefano <jacopo.notarstefano@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I think you fundamentally cannot use two labels that are merely
>> "distinct" and bisect correctly.  You need to know which ones
>> (i.e. good) are to be excluded and the other (i.e. bad) are to be
>> included when computing the "remaining to be tested" set of commits.
>
> Good point. Yes, this isn't viable.

But if you make them into --no-longer-X vs --still-X, then it will
be viable without us knowing what X means.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]