Re: [PATCH][GSOC2014] changed logical chain in branch.c to lookup tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sunshine wrote
> Even allowing internationalization of them (via N_() in the location[]
> and type[] tables) might not be sufficient since grammatical rules
> differ from language to language.

I didn't fully understand what you meant by that. Since they were being
internationalized before using _() in the if-else bodies, wouldn't it
produce
the same output if I were to use the same method for location[] and type[]
tables?




--
View this message in context: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/PATCH-GSOC2014-changed-logical-chain-in-branch-c-to-lookup-tables-tp7605343p7605372.html
Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]