On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Replace all instances of starts_with() by skip_prefix(),
> which can not only be used to check presence of a prefix,
> but also used further on as it returns the string after the prefix,
> if the prefix is present. And also manages to do, what the current
> code does in two steps.
Better. Thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hello Eric,
> In this patch, I have:
> 1. Fixed the improper placement of buf_date , initialised to a NULL string.
> 2. Fixed whitespace.
> 3. Better naming as per your suggestion.
> 4. Fixed the initilisation before the if statement.
> Thanks for your suggestion.
> ---
> commit.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
> index 6bf4fe0..4144e00 100644
> --- a/commit.c
> +++ b/commit.c
> @@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ static void record_author_date(struct author_date_slab *author_date,
> struct ident_split ident;
> char *date_end;
> unsigned long date;
> + const char *buf_date;
>
> if (!commit->buffer) {
> unsigned long size;
> @@ -565,15 +566,15 @@ static void record_author_date(struct author_date_slab *author_date,
> for (buf = commit->buffer ? commit->buffer : buffer;
> buf;
> buf = line_end + 1) {
> + buf_date = skip_prefix(buf, "author ");
The data after "author " is identification information (name, email),
not date. In fact, this information gets passed to the function
split_ident_line(), so a better name for this variable is 'ident_line'
(but not the misspelling 'indent_line' from one of your earlier
attempts).
> line_end = strchrnul(buf, '\n');
> - if (!starts_with(buf, "author ")) {
> + if (!buf_date) {
> if (!line_end[0] || line_end[1] == '\n')
> return; /* end of header */
> continue;
> }
> - if (split_ident_line(&ident,
> - buf + strlen("author "),
> - line_end - (buf + strlen("author "))) ||
> + if (split_ident_line(&ident, buf_date,
> + line_end - buf_date) ||
> !ident.date_begin || !ident.date_end)
> goto fail_exit; /* malformed "author" line */
> break;
> @@ -1098,6 +1099,7 @@ int parse_signed_commit(const unsigned char *sha1,
> char *buffer = read_sha1_file(sha1, &type, &size);
> int in_signature, saw_signature = -1;
> char *line, *tail;
> + const char *gpg_sig;
>
> if (!buffer || type != OBJ_COMMIT)
> goto cleanup;
> @@ -1113,9 +1115,9 @@ int parse_signed_commit(const unsigned char *sha1,
> next = next ? next + 1 : tail;
> if (in_signature && line[0] == ' ')
> sig = line + 1;
> - else if (starts_with(line, gpg_sig_header) &&
> - line[gpg_sig_header_len] == ' ')
> - sig = line + gpg_sig_header_len + 1;
> + else if ((gpg_sig = skip_prefix(line, gpg_sig_header))
> + && gpg_sig[0] == ' ')
> + sig = gpg_sig + 1;
Other than the poor variable name 'buf_date' and the review comments
by Junio and Tanay that this particular change is of questionable
value and perhaps should be dropped, this version of the patch looks
reasonable.
Thanks.
> if (sig) {
> strbuf_add(signature, sig, next - sig);
> saw_signature = 1;
> @@ -1193,10 +1195,8 @@ static void parse_gpg_output(struct signature_check *sigc)
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sigcheck_gpg_status); i++) {
> const char *found, *next;
>
> - if (starts_with(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1)) {
> - /* At the very beginning of the buffer */
> - found = buf + strlen(sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1);
> - } else {
> + found = skip_prefix(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1);
> + if (!found) {
> found = strstr(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check);
> if (!found)
> continue;
> --
> 1.9.0.138.g2de3478
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html