Re: gc/repack has no option to lose grafted parents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Back in http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/PATCH-0-2-Make-git-gc-more-robust-with-regard-to-grafts-td3310281.html
> we got gc/repack to be safer for users who might be shooting
> themselves in the foot.
>
> Would a patch be welcome to add --discard-grafted-objects ? or
> --keep-real-parents=idontthinkso ?
>
> cheers,

Given that we in general frown upon long-term use of grafts (or
"replace" for that matter), I am not sure if we want to go in that
direction.

Just a knee-jerk reaction, though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]