Re: [PATCH 6/6] merge hook tests: use 'test_must_fail' instead of '!'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh b/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh
> index 604c06e..1be6cec 100755
> --- a/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh
> +++ b/t/t7505-prepare-commit-msg-hook.sh
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ test_expect_success 'with failing hook' '
>  	head=`git rev-parse HEAD` &&
>  	echo "more" >> file &&
>  	git add file &&
> -	! GIT_EDITOR="\"\$FAKE_EDITOR\"" git commit -c $head
> +	test_must_fail env GIT_EDITOR="\"\$FAKE_EDITOR\"" git commit -c $head

Thanks. It is good that you avoided the common pitfall of attempting

	GIT_EDITOR=... test_must_fail git commit -c $head    ;# WRONG

but do we assume everybody has "env"?

To be portable, we can do this instead.

	(
		GIT_EDITOR=... &&
        	export GIT_EDITOR &&
                test_must_fail git commit -c $head
	)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]