Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:24:52AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Anyway, all of these issues makes me suspect that the proper blame > > interface is to basically *hide* the blame almost entirely, in order to > > make the important parts much more visible, and in order to encourage > > people to start looking for the piece of code that they are actually > > interested in. > > One approach which might work is where you hover your mouse over a > line, and it pops up a tiny window with the blame information if the > mouse remains stationary for more than a second or two. > > Another thing which would be really useful is where the lines that > have been changed in the last n commits (where n is probably between > 3-5) are highlighted using different colors. That way you can see > what was changed recently, which is often what you are most interested > in. (As in, what changed recently that might have caused this file to > get all screwed up?) In case you are interested, I've tweaked the display of annotation data in git-gui. The latest version lets you run blame right from the command line: git-gui blame master revision.c Clicking on a line colors that line and all lines which are blamed on the same commit as yellow; the commit before it (ancestor) is colored blue and the commit after it (descendant) is colored red. The bottom part of the window is used to show the commit SHA-1, author, committer and complete log message. I have not yet added navigating to the prior commit, or support for the new --contents flag. Because the data is now in the bottom pane (and not in columns), the display is about 90 characters wide, instead of 180 or whatever insane value it was. -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html