Hi Eric,
Yes, you're right. "!!" is comfortably concise and also idiomatic in
Git sources.
Thanks,
Guanglin
2014-03-03 16:12 GMT+08:00 Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Guanglin Xu <mzguanglin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> to avoid a magic code of 11.
>>
>> Helped-by: Sun He <sunheeh...@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Helped-by: Jacopo Notarstefano <jaco...@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guanglin Xu <mzguanglin@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> This is an implementation of the idea#2 of GSoC 2014 microproject.
>>
>> branch.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
>> index 723a36b..4eec0ac 100644
>> --- a/branch.c
>> +++ b/branch.c
>> @@ -49,8 +49,12 @@ static int should_setup_rebase(const char *origin)
>>
>> void install_branch_config(int flag, const char *local, const char *origin, const char *remote)
>> {
>> - const char *shortname = remote + 11;
>> - int remote_is_branch = starts_with(remote, "refs/heads/");
>> + const char *shortname = skip_prefix(remote ,"refs/heads/");
>> + int remote_is_branch;
>> + if (NULL == shortname)
>> + remote_is_branch = 0;
>> + else
>> + remote_is_branch = 1;
>
> A bit verbose. Perhaps just:
>
> int remote_is_branch = !!shortname;
>
> which you will find to be idiomatic in this project.
>
>> struct strbuf key = STRBUF_INIT;
>> int rebasing = should_setup_rebase(origin);
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html