Signed-off-by: Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@xxxxxxxxx>
---
commit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
index 6bf4fe0..c954ecb 100644
--- a/commit.c
+++ b/commit.c
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ static void record_author_date(struct author_date_slab *author_date,
buf;
buf = line_end + 1) {
line_end = strchrnul(buf, '\n');
- if (!starts_with(buf, "author ")) {
+ if (!skip_prefix(buf, "author ")) {
if (!line_end[0] || line_end[1] == '\n')
return; /* end of header */
continue;
--
1.7.9.5
Hello,
This is my patch for the GSoC microproject #10:
Rewrite commit.c:record_author_date() to use skip_prefix().
Are there other places in this file where skip_prefix() would be more
readable than starts_with()?
Since skip_prefix() and starts_with() implement the same functionality with different
return values, they can be interchanged easily.
Other usage of starts_with() in the same file can be found with
$ grep -n starts_with commit.c
1116: else if (starts_with(line, gpg_sig_header) &&
1196: if (starts_with(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1)) {
I have a query,should I tackle a bug from the mailing lists or research about the proposal
and present a rough draft?
Cheers,
Tanay Abhra.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html