Re: Make the git codebase thread-safe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It shouldn't be hard for us to run some tests with this patch applied.
 Will report back in a day or two.

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ...
>>> 2) Use TLS as you suggest and have one fd per pack thread.  Probably
>>> the most complicated code change (at least for me, being a first-time
>>> contributor)
>>
>> It's not so complicated. I suggested a patch [1] before (surprise!).
>> ...
>> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/196042
>
> That message is at the tail end of the discussion. I wonder why
> nothing came out of it back then.
>
> While I do not see anything glaringly wrong with the change from a
> quick glance over it, it would be nice to hear how well it performs
> on their platform from Windows folks.
>
> Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]