On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 07:59:18PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Josef Wolf <jw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >> Notice the refs/heads _within_ refs/heads!
> > Probably you did something like "git branch refs/heads/master". You can
> > remove it again with "git branch -d refs/heads/master".
> As a porcelain, "git branch" should prevent (or at least warn) users
> from creating such refs, I think.
I don't think I did it the way Andreas thinks. This repository is maintained
by a script, I don't create branches manually. The only command in this script
that uses "heads" is
git symbolic-ref HEAD "refs/heads/$new_branch"
to create new branches without any ancestry. And I double-checked that this
command is _not_ resposible for those ghost branches.
BTW: I see such ghost branches reappearing again and again, so it must be
something systematic.
--
Josef Wolf
jw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html