Re: [PATCH for 'next'] fast-import: in_merge_bases() has a different signature now

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> The function in_merge_bases() can take more than one reference now,
> and therefore we need to call it differently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> ---
>
> 	Yes, yes, I know. BAD Dscho. Still not using master. Maybe 
> 	tomorrow I will find the time to rebase my changes on top of
> 	next to master. That will be my first experience with git-rebase!

Thanks for a heads-up.

It _might_ be worth merging the in_merge_bases() from 'next' to
'master', either up to 03840fc3 or all the way to dc3806d3.

But I'd resist the temptation for now.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]