On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 6:19 PM, David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Since Git has a working facility for references that is catered to do > exactly this kind of mapping and already _does_, it seems like a > convenient path to explore. It will not scale. If you make those refs available for cloning/fetching, all of them will be advertised first thing when git starts negotiate. Imagine thousands of refs (and keep increasing) sent to the receiver at the beginning of every connection. Something like "reverse git-notes" may transfer more efficiently. Or we need to improve git protocol to handle massive refs better, something that's been discussed for a while without any outcome. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html