Re: [PATCH] Ensure __BYTE_ORDER is always set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:12:05PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

> Jeff King wrote:
> 
> > I do find the failure mode interesting. The endian-swapping code kicked
> > in when it did not
> 
> Odd --- wouldn't the #if condition expand to '0 != 0'?

I had the same thought. The "kicked in when it did not" is Brian's claim
from the original, which is why I was confused. He replied to me
off-list, and I think he may simply have had it backwards. :)

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]