Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] cherry-pick, revert: add the --gpg-sign option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 01:00:06PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > +-S[<keyid>]::
> > +--gpg-sign[=<keyid>]::
> > +	GPG-sign commits.
> > +
> 
> Does this accept --no-gpg-sign?  If not, shouldn't it?

It does not.  I took Nicolas's patches from the list and applied them to
master, so nothing from next is there, including the commit.gpgsign
stuff.

Would you prefer I rebased them on next instead?

> > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> > index 90cac7b..bde5f04 100644
> > --- a/sequencer.c
> > +++ b/sequencer.c
> > @@ -392,11 +392,18 @@ static int run_git_commit(const char *defmsg, struct replay_opts *opts,
> >  {
> >  	struct argv_array array;
> >  	int rc;
> > +	char *gpg_sign;
> >  
> >  	argv_array_init(&array);
> >  	argv_array_push(&array, "commit");
> >  	argv_array_push(&array, "-n");
> >  
> > +	if (opts->gpg_sign) {
> > +		gpg_sign = xmalloc(3 + strlen(opts->gpg_sign));
> > +		sprintf(gpg_sign, "-S%s", opts->gpg_sign);
> > +		argv_array_push(&array, gpg_sign);
> > +		free(gpg_sign);
> > +	}
> 
> Here you would need to invent a new way to propagate --no-gpg-sign
> to subsequent invocations, I think.

Probably.  It wouldn't be too terribly difficult.

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]