Re: [PATCH 3/3] ewah: support platforms that require aligned reads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vicent Martí wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> +#if __BYTE_ORDER != __BIG_ENDIAN
>>
>> Is this portable?
>
> We explicitly set the __BYTE_ORDER macros in `compat/bswap.h`. In
> fact, this preprocessor conditional is the same one that we use when
> choosing what version of the `ntohl` macro to define, so that's why I
> decided to use it here.

Ah, thanks.  Sorry I missed that.  So feel free to add my reviewed-by
to the patch without my tweak, too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]