Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two janitorial patches for builtin/blame.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Kastrup wrote:

> The combination of the SubmittingPatches text with the file notices in
> builtin/blame.c is not really painting a full picture of the situation.

BTW, thanks for bringing this up.  It last came up at [1].  Perhaps we
can do better by adding a note to README or some similar file
explaining that git is under the GPLv2 and files use that license when
not otherwise specified.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/234705/focus=234709
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]