Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] t7406: Just-cloned checkouts update to the gitlinked hash with 'reset'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"W. Trevor King" <wking@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:22:52AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> "W. Trevor King" <wking@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > To preserve the local branch, for situations where we're not on a
>> > detached HEAD.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> 
>> This should be a part of some other change that actually changes how
>> this "git submodule update" checks out the submodule, no?
>
> Sure, we can squash both this test fix and the subsequent new test
> patch into patch #3 in v5.  I was just splitting them out because
> backwards compatibility was a concern, and separate patches makes it
> easy for me to explain why the results changed here without getting
> lost in patch #3's implementation details.

On the contrary, if we had this as part of patch #3, it would have
helped reviewing the patch itself, as that would have served as one
more clue to illustrate the effect that is externally visible to end
users.

Besides, having them separate will break bisection.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]