Re: [PATCH 0/3] t0000 cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:51:25AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>> 	These scratch areas for sub-tests should be under the t0000
>> 	trash directory, but because the TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
>> 	setting from the toplevel test leaks
[...]
> This is not exactly true. The TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY setting does not
> leak. t0000 sets $TEST_DIRECTORY (which it must, so the sub-scripts can
> find test-lib.sh and friends), and then TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY uses that
> as a default if it is not explicitly set.

So I should have said something like the following instead:

	These scratch areas for sub-tests should be under the t0000 trash
	directory, but because TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY defaults to
	TEST_DIRECTORY which is exported to help sub-tests find test-lib.sh,
	the sub-test trash directories are created under the toplevel t/
	directory instead.  Because some of the sub-tests simulate failures,
	their trash directories are kept around.

	Fix it by explicitly setting TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY appropriately
	for sub-tests.

Thanks for catching it.

Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]