On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:20:52PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Adam Spiers <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > 2. What difference does --dense ever make? > > It is set by default, and --sparse is its opposite option, i.e. it > turns revs->dense off. Ah. It appears to be missing from the man page that it's the default. > When revs->dense is turned off, the usual treesame logic does not > kick in to rewrite parents in a single strand of pearls (i.e. a > stretch of history that solely consists of non-merge commits). I see. > > 3. Why is --sparse so called, given that it increases rather than > > decreases the number of commits shown? > > The number of commits in the output will increase by including > commits that are irrelevant to explain the history of paths > specified by pathspec in revs->prune. The information density > decreases as the result, and that is what "sparse" signifies. Ah OK, that makes sense now, but not the most intuitive choice of name IMHO. I would have gone for something like --all-commits, but I guess it's way too late to change now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html