"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> refname = prettify_refname(refname);
> add_name_decoration(type, refname, obj);
> while (obj->type == OBJ_TAG) {
> - obj = ((struct tag *)obj)->tagged;
> - if (!obj)
> - break;
> + struct object *tagged = ((struct tag *)obj)->tagged;
> + if (!tagged) {
> + obj = parse_object(obj->sha1);
> + if (!obj)
> + break;
> + tagged = ((struct tag *)obj)->tagged;
> + if (!tagged)
> + break;
> + }
> + obj = tagged;
> add_name_decoration(DECORATION_REF_TAG, refname, obj);
> }
OK, the above is not wrong per-se but it took me three reads to
convince myself that I understood what was going on.
Before entering this loop, obj has already been parsed, it is known
to be an annotated tag object, and its obj->tagged field is valid,
but the object pointed at by the tag may still not be parsed yet.
The object given to add_name_decoration() before we enter the loop
has been parsed, but the one given at the end of this loop is not.
I think all we need to do, in addition to what the existing code
does, is to make sure that we _parse_ the object that the tag points
at, to avoid this problem. Something like this, perhaps, instead?
diff --git a/log-tree.c b/log-tree.c
index 8534d91..1982631 100644
--- a/log-tree.c
+++ b/log-tree.c
@@ -132,10 +132,12 @@ static int add_ref_decoration(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, in
add_name_decoration(type, refname, obj);
while (obj->type == OBJ_TAG) {
obj = ((struct tag *)obj)->tagged;
if (!obj)
break;
+ if (!obj->parsed)
+ parse_object(obj->sha1);
add_name_decoration(DECORATION_REF_TAG, refname, obj);
}
return 0;
}
It seems to me that the above is not just sufficient, but also shows
what the breakage was really about a lot more clearly, at least to
me.
Hmm?
> diff --git a/t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh b/t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh
> index fb00041..2a6278b 100755
> --- a/t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh
> +++ b/t/t4205-log-pretty-formats.sh
> @@ -310,4 +310,19 @@ EOF
> test_cmp expected actual
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'log decoration properly follows tag chain' '
> + git tag -a tag1 -m tag1 &&
> + git tag -a tag2 -m tag2 tag1 &&
> + git tag -d tag1 &&
> + git commit --amend -m shorter &&
> + git log --no-walk --tags --pretty="%H %d" --decorate=full >actual &&
> + cat <<EOF >expected &&
> +6a908c10688b2503073c39c9ba26322c73902bb5 (tag: refs/tags/tag2)
> +9f716384d92283fb915a4eee5073f030638e05f9 (tag: refs/tags/message-one)
> +b87e4cccdb77336ea79d89224737be7ea8e95367 (tag: refs/tags/message-two)
> +EOF
> + sort actual >actual1 &&
> + test_cmp expected actual1
> +'
> +
> test_done
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html