----- Original Message -----
From: "Antoine Pelisse" <apelisse@xxxxxxxxx>
<snip>
You can also have a look at what is currently being applied:
$ git diff :1:gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c
:3:gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c
By the way, does anybody know a better way to do that ? I happen to do
that quite a lot when fixing complex conflicts and the command is
quite inconvenient (I always end-up forgetting which numbers to use,
etc..).
Would this be a good use of the
* Magic pathspecs like ":(icase)
that was recently released (v1.8.5 2Dec13) so that the merge stages
can be named.
I'm not sure that the three 'merge stages' have well defined short names
yet though.
[1]
http://schacon.github.io/gitbook/5_advanced_branching_and_merging.html
[2] https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-merge.html see
True Merge 4.
Aside: the 'merge stages' terminology does overlap the common user
discussion of commit staging e.g. $gmane/236127 (Officially start moving
to the term 'staging area'). Any pathspec magic names should reflect the
concept being indicated rather than the implementation - a thorny
problem.
Hope that helps,
Antoine
--
Philip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html