On 2/4/07, Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello, Marco! While at that, we should think how to show refs in a more compact manner in the revision list. I think "refs/" can be dropped in any case, since qgit only scans under refs. Any rectangle implies "refs/" already. That's what gitk does.
After the posted two patches "refs/" is shown only in StGIT bases. Currently qgit uses 'git show-ref -d' to retrieve ref list and "ref/" prefix is already in git-show-ref output, so as a general rule I would try to avoid 'massaging' git output as much as is possible to have more chances thing do not break after a git behaviour change. It is difficult now to say it's (and will be) true that refs are only under "refs/". Perhaps in the future someone came up with an idea to use "refs_of_some_kind/" directory and this would break stuff. So last line is: if git-show-ref prints this info, perhaps it's better to keep. Marco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html