Thomas Rast wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Thomas Rast wrote: >>> This shuts up compiler warnings about unused functions. >> >> If that is the only goal, I think it would be cleaner to use >> >> #define MAYBE_UNUSED __attribute__((__unused__)) >> >> static MAYBE_UNUSED void init_ ... >> >> like was done in the vcs-svn/ directory until cba3546 (drop obj_pool, >> 2010-12-13) et al. >> >> I haven't thought carefully about whether encouraging inlining here >> (or encouraging the reader to think of these functions as inline) is a >> good or bad change. > > Hmm. > > I actually had this idea after seeing the same trick in khash.h. Is > __atribute__((__unused__)) universal? If so, maybe we could apply the > same also to khash? If not, I'd rather go with the inline. The khash functions are very small, so it very well may make sense for them to be inline. git-compat-util.h (or compat/msvc.h) defines __attribute__(x) to an empty sequence of tokens except on HP C and gcc. Attribute unused has existed at least since GCC 2.95. Unfortunately HP C doesn't support attribute __unused__. :( http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/download/files/unprot/aCxx/Online_Help/pragmas.htm#Attributes On the bright side, it would be easy to work around using a conditional definition of MAYBE_UNUSED for the sake of HP C. From August 2010 until March 2011 nobody noticed. Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html