Re: [PATCH 00/86] replace prefixcmp() with has_prefix()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Christian Couder
<chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 07:47:03AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
>>
>>> My preference is:
>>>
>>> 1) with an "s"
>>> 2) "start"
>>> 3) underscore
>>>
>>> so that gives: starts_with() and ends_with()
>>
>> FWIW, that looks good to me, too. Whether there is confusion over the
>> meaning of "suffix" or not, it makes sense, all other things being
>> equal, to use the same terms as other popular languages.
>>
>> Like you, I prefer "with an s", but we are deep in bikeshedding
>> territory now. I can live with anything. :)
>
> When I prepared a new version of my patch series, this time to rename
> suffixcmp() to ends_with(), it appeared that we already have a static
> ends_with() function in vcs-svn/fast_export.c with another slightly
> different implementation :-)
>
> I will send a new version that will remove this redundant
> implementation.

There is also a new version of my 86 patch long series to replace
prefixcmp() with starts_with() that I am ready to send, but I hesitate
to spam the whole list :-)
I can put it somewhere like GitHub where people can see everything and
perhaps send only a few patches to the list, including the first and
the last.
@Junio, how would you like me to proceed?

Thanks,
Christian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]