ycollette.nospam@xxxxxxx writes: > The bugzilla approach is really useful for the user who is reporting > bugs: all the bugs are tracked, you can see if a bug has been already > filled and put some additional informations if necessary. As a user, the most important thing is that the bug is eventually fixed. I had a lot of experiences with projects using bugtrackers, where I filed bugs, and the bugs were burried forever in the bugtracker. Not all projects are like this, but the danger of using a bugtracker to have long-standing bugs forgotten is high. It is especially high when there's no one paid to maintain the list of open bugs low. As opposed to this, most bug reports on this list are followed by a lively discussion and a patch. Sure, a bugtracker could complement this, but someone would have to volunteer to set up and maintain one, and to get developpers interested in fixing bugs reported there. There have been attempts, but AFAIK no success. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html