Re: Add a bugzilla website

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:40:47 +0100 (CET)
ycollette.nospam@xxxxxxx wrote:

> And the conclusion is ? No bugzilla tool installed because somebody
> want to build a gitbased bugzilla thing ?

Well, no, the real answer is that for those who actually write code and
apply patches, an e-mail based workflow is simpler: Git has tools to
apply patches right from Unix mailboxes, so one is able to just save a
thread with the final patch series to a file and apply it.  Some people
also prefer discussing patches inline -- in the same e-mail thread
the patch series being discussed had started.

I'm aware of at least one big project sporting the same approach
to handling bugs -- PostgreSQL.

But there was an announcement that an experimental JIRA instance has
been set up for Git [1].  I'm not sure what its current status is, but
you could look at it.

Also Git's mirror on github [2] supposedly provides for pull requests.
Again, not sure whether/how they're handled.

1. http://git-blame.blogspot.ru/2012/02/experimental-git-bug-tracker.html
2. https://github.com/git/git/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]