Re: [PATCH v3] push: Enhance unspecified push default warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Actually, to me, I found the "two sentences" the worst part in the
> original.  It made it sound as if the default will be switching to
> 'upstream', and all readers need to read the second sentence that
> clarifies that it is not the case, in a somewhat round-about
> way---"will only succeed if" invites "and otherwise...?"

To me, this is not an issue given the audience (people too lazy to read
the docs): for them, current == simple == upstream modulo details
they're not interested about. The safety measure of "simple" is actually
here to make sure nothing wrong happens if they make the confusion.

But that's just a preference, I'm OK with your other proposal too.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]