On Friday, 02 February 2007 at 19:19, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Brendan Cully wrote: > > On Friday, 02 February 2007 at 08:42, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> > >> The mistake seems to be to think that tags get "versioned", and are part > >> of the tree history. That's insane. It means that you can never have a tag > >> to a newer tree than the one you are on. > > > > The tags you use can simply be those from the tip of the repository, > > regardless of which revision you've currently checked out. > > _Can_ be or _are_ (in Mercurial)? Besides, there can be more than one are. The meaning of tags depends on the repository, not the "index". > tip of repository (branch are tips of history), and making set of tags > dependent on which branch you are on is not a good idea either. agreed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html