On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:58:06AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On 01/02/07, Yann Dirson <ydirson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Previously we were just assuming that the remote from which we > >just failed defined a local branch whose name was the same as the > >remote def, and that this branch was the parent. While this is true > >for the most common case (branch "origin" from remote "origin"), it is > >quite an unflexible assumption. > > The t1200-push-modified.sh test fails after applying this patch. It > looks like the 3rd test fails to pull the changes from 'foo' into > 'bar'. Strange, it passes here, even after pulling you latest commits (HEAD=fba895f5f12a652c248b0fd02b7c41f8342cfbdc). Best regards, -- Yann. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html