Re: [PATCH] t/README: tests can use perl even with NO_PERL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 28.10.2013 20:22, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> The git build system supports a NO_PERL switch to avoid installing
> perl bindings or other features (like "git add --patch") that rely on
> perl on runtime, but even with NO_PERL it has not been possible for a
> long time to run tests without perl.  Helpers such as
> 
> 	nul_to_q () {
> 		"$PERL_PATH" -pe 'y/\000/Q/'
> 	}
> 
> use perl as a better tr or sed and are regularly used in tests without
> worrying to add a PERL prerequisite.
> 
> Perl is portable enough that it seems fine to keep relying on it for
> this kind of thing in tests (and more readable than the alternative of
> trying to find POSIXy equivalents).  Update the test documentation to
> clarify this.

Thank you for the clarification!

-- Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]