Jed Brown <jed@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Jed Brown <jed@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> I suspect that it would be too late for 2.0 we want to do sometime >>>> early next year, though. >>> >>> How would you manage transition from the current behavior? Warning >>> people to explicitly use "." or ":/" during some interim period sounds >>> worse than just switching the default behavior. >> >> "How would I"? >> >> You're asking that question only because you omitted too much from >> the quote ;-) > > I meant that if the proposed migration plan were to be "just change it > and people will learn" (because anything more gradual would actually be > worse for users) then is it really too late for Git-2.0? That may be an option. In the case of "git add -u", it was a bit more complicated, since a badly used "git add" somehow looses data (not very serious, you may only loos the index). So, saying after the fact "oh, by the way, I messed up the index" was not a very good transition plan. In the case of "grep", I'm starting to get convinced that it's OK to do so, because the user can basically re-run grep with the right argument if needed. The warning could be de-activable with an advice.* option. Again, no strong opinion here, but that seems workable to me. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html