Krzysztof Mazur wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:03:26PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > not some "next" behavior that may change in future. > > > > But I'm suggesting to add a core.addremove option as well, like you suggested, > > am I not? > > Yes, I think we both agreed on adding core.addremove. I'm just not > convinced if we should also add core.mode. If we add core.addremove, all the issues you mentioned are solved. If we do that, now the question is, how exactly does core.mode = next affect anybody genatively? If you don't like it, you don't set it, that's why it's a configuration. I don't see the problem. > > So you would be happy if we had core.addremove = true *and* core.mode = next, > > right? You would use one, different people with different needs would use the > > other. > > Yes, if there are people that will use core.mode it will be worth > adding. I'm just not one of them. I am already using it. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html