Re: [PATCH] mv: Fix spurious warning when moving a file in presence of submodules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Matthieu Moy wrote:
>> Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@xxxxxx> writes:
>
>>>  static struct lock_file lock_file;
>>> +#define SUBMODULE_WITH_GITDIR ((const char *)1)
>>
>> I don't like very much hardcoded addresses like this. Are you 100% sure
>> address 1 will never be returned by xstrdup on any platform? The risk is
>> small if not negligible, but I'm unconfortable with this.
>
> I haven't checked what the standards say, but in practice I think it's
> okay.  [...]  We use (void *) 1 in the same way a few places currently.

OK, fine with me.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]