Thomas Rast wrote: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Existing gitk chokes on 'gitk -S foo', but works with 'git -Sfoo'. >> >> I somehow thought that we encourage the "stuck/sticked" form, to >> reduce things the users need to remember to cope better with options >> with optional value. > > I just looked into this again, to get it rolling. > > Am I reading you correctly as saying that any support for the unstuck > form is entirely coincidental, and it's okay to support only the stuck > version in new gitk? Sort of. :) gitcli(7) says that the sticked form is to be preferred "when you are scripting git". But most git commands use parse-options, which of course supports both forms and makes life easier for humans. Support for just the sticked form is better than nothing, especially if the gitk(1) manpage gains a note about it. In the long run I guess the ideal would be to add a parse-options-like library to the tcl support. My two cents, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html