Junio C Hamano wrote:
Although from the consistency point of view, HEAD reflog to follow swicthing branches like Nico's patch aims for (but not implements fully yet) makes perfect sense, I still am somewhat doubtful about it being actually useful in practice.
I think that's quite useful.
Even if we
assume it is useful, I think forbidding people from saying
HEAD@{...} right now only because the new semantics is
unimplemented yet feels wrong. If you use only one branch,
there is no difference between the reflog of master and HEAD
today, without waiting for that "reflog on HEAD".
I don't know how people are used to type HEAD@{..}, but why not:
1. have .@{..} or @@{..} for "the current branch i am on" and have HEAD@{..} behave like nicolas is aiming to do.
2. have HEAD@{..} to mean "the current branch i am on" and invent something else for "HEAD commit". doesn't sound too logic, though.
ignore me if i'm sounding stupid :)
cheers
simon
--
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature