On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Marc Branchaud wrote: > On 13-09-30 04:08 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Again, in the cases where there is actually a SHA1 conflict between all > > possible tags that match a tag short-end then listing them and asking the > > user to be more explicit is the right thing to do. But that should be a > > very rare case in practice, and designing for making this case easy is > > the wrong approach. > > > > Instead, the common case of multiple remotes with duplicated tag names > > referring to the same thing _and/or_ multiple remotes with distinct tags > > names is what should be made easy to use with no extra steps. > > Again, I don't think that's the common case. I think it's just as likely for > there to be multiple remotes with duplicate tag names that refer to different > objects. Why do you say so? I'm curious to know what kind of work flow would do that in practice. At least for typical Linux kernel workflows what I said above is true. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html