Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] New hash table implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:50:16AM +0200, Karsten Blees wrote:
>> Tests can be reproduced with 'time echo "perfhash[map] <method> 1000" | ./test-hashmap', see test-hashmap.c for definition of method flags.
>
> So I'm still curious about the actual performance improvements for git.
> I runned git describe on the linux kernel with both the old hashmap and
> this new one:
>
> ...
>
> I can't see any improvements at all here. What do I miss? Am I running
> git describe in the wrong way? Does linux.git have too few tags to be
> important?

I wonder if it makes any difference if there are a lot more refs. I
hear gerrit creates a lot but don't know how many. linux-2.6 has ~350
refs. How about increasing the number of refs to 3500 refs?
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]