Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] New hash table implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Karsten,

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>         |       add        |  get 100% hits  |    get 10% hits
>         |  hash  | hashmap | hash  | hashmap |  hash   | hashmap
> --------+--------+---------+-------+---------+---------+--------
> FNV     | 14.815 |   2.345 | 3.059 |   1.642 |   4.085 |   0.976
> FNV  x2 | 14.409 |   2.706 | 2.888 |   1.959 |   3.905 |   1.393
> i       |  7.432 |   1.593 | 1.364 |   1.142 | 413.023 |   0.589
> i    x2 |  9.169 |   1.866 | 1.427 |   1.163 |   0.757 |   0.670
> i/10    |  1.800 |   1.555 | 5.365 |   6.465 |  32.918 |   1.052
> i/10 x2 |  1.892 |   1.555 | 5.386 |   6.474 |   1.123 |   1.206
>
> Tests can be reproduced with 'time echo "perfhash[map] <method> 1000" | ./test-hashmap', see test-hashmap.c for definition of method flags.

I'm not sure if I'm reading the numbers right, but they look impressive!

If it's not too much trouble, could you put together an API document,
along the lines of Documentation/technical/api-hash.txt? I could give
a stab at replacing patience and histogram diff's hash implementation
with yours.

-- 
Cheers,
Ray Chuan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]