r.ductor@xxxxxxxxx writes: > mmm maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the first statement > on the index (above) is oversimplifing. Yes, it was simplified to illustrate the principle, not even trying to be exhaustive. The principle is that we allow you to check out a different branch when you have local changes to the working tree and/or to the index, as long as we can make the index and the working tree pretend as if you reached that locally modified state, starting from a clean state of the branch you are checking out. That is what "your modifications in context" in the description of the "-m" option refers to. It directly follows that a local change to the index at a path is carried forward when you check out a different branch, if HEAD and the branch you are checking out have the same contents registered at the path. The message you are responding to illustrated that principle by talking about changes to the working tree but the same principle applies to changes to the index, as changes to the working tree is much easier to picture in your mind. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html