Re: Bisect needing to be at repo top-level?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17 September 2013 18:27, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Why does git-bisect need to be ran from the top level of the working
>> tree?  It sources git-sh-setup.sh which sets GIT_DIR, which
>> git-bisect.sh then appears to consistently use.  Is there a reason for
>> needing to be at the top-level, or is this an old and redundant
>> message?
>
> A wild guess.
>
> Imagine if you start from a subdirectory foo/ but the directory did
> not exist in the older part of the history of the project.  When
> bisect needs to check out a revision that was older than the first
> revision that introduced that subdirectory, what should happen?
> Worse yet, if "foo" was a file in the older part of the history,
> what should happen?

"git checkout" doesn't mandate that you're at the top-level, so that's
not a very strong argument.

Ross
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]