Re: RFC: git bisect should accept "paths-to-be-excluded"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Matthieu Moy
<Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> In practice though, as git bisect is a kind of binary search, if what
>> you want to exclude is exclusively touched by half the commits, it
>> will only add one more bisection step if you don't exclude it.
>
> Actually, I think the same remark would apply to any other Git command
> that deal with a set of revisions. If you want to review code with "git
> log -p", but you don't care about a subdirectory, you may want a "git
> log -p --ignore-dir foo/" or so, too.

Yeah, and there was a patch series about that 2 years ago:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/182830/

> And then, the "it's logarithmic" argument doesn't work anymore ;-).

Sure.

Best regards,
Christian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]